Catullus, Carmina 16
Feb. 13th, 2012 19:33I nearly inflicted this (as well as 15 and 48, coming tomorrow) on my students today, and then I decided that I wasn't going to traumatize them without it being completely pedagogically relevant.
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo,
Aureli pathice et cinaede Furi,
qui me ex versiculis meis putastis,
quod sunt molliculi, parum pudicum.
Nam castum esse decet pium poetam
ipsum, versiculos nihil necesse est;
qui tum denique habent salem ac leporem,
si sunt molliculi ac parum pudici
et quod pruriat incitare possunt,
non dico pueris, sed his pilosis,
qui duros nequeunt movere lumbos.
Vos quod milia multa basiorum
legistis, male me marem putatis?
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo.
I'll bugger and face-fuck you,
Aurelius the cocksucker and Furius the faggot,
You who think, from my little verses,
That I am soft and indecent, because they are.
Now the dutiful poet ought to be pure himself,
But that's not necessary for his little poems;
Which, in the end, have salt and charm
If they are soft and immodest
And are able to stir up desire,
And I'm not talking about in boys, but in those hairy men
Who aren't able to move their stiff thighs.
You, because you've read about many thousands of kisses,
You don't think that I'm a real man?
I'll bugger and face-fuck you.
Although I've chosen to use current homophobic terms for "cinaede" and "pathice" in line two, it's important to emphasize that the tenor of the insult is completely different in context. Contemporary society categorizes sexuality in terms of bodies: which kind of biologically sexed body are you attracted to, and is it the same as yours or different? In the ancient world, specifically in the Greek and Roman context, the distinction was about who did what to whom, rather than what kind of body was being done to: the concern was not to be the sexually "passive," i.e. the penetratee, in sexual acts, but rather to be the penetrator, i.e. "active." It was perfectly permissible for adult men to take an active role with whomever, and for boys and youths to take the passive role in such relationships--however, the ideal (or the ideology) was that these relationships would involve at most intercrural sex, rather than anal penetration.
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo,
Aureli pathice et cinaede Furi,
qui me ex versiculis meis putastis,
quod sunt molliculi, parum pudicum.
Nam castum esse decet pium poetam
ipsum, versiculos nihil necesse est;
qui tum denique habent salem ac leporem,
si sunt molliculi ac parum pudici
et quod pruriat incitare possunt,
non dico pueris, sed his pilosis,
qui duros nequeunt movere lumbos.
Vos quod milia multa basiorum
legistis, male me marem putatis?
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo.
I'll bugger and face-fuck you,
Aurelius the cocksucker and Furius the faggot,
You who think, from my little verses,
That I am soft and indecent, because they are.
Now the dutiful poet ought to be pure himself,
But that's not necessary for his little poems;
Which, in the end, have salt and charm
If they are soft and immodest
And are able to stir up desire,
And I'm not talking about in boys, but in those hairy men
Who aren't able to move their stiff thighs.
You, because you've read about many thousands of kisses,
You don't think that I'm a real man?
I'll bugger and face-fuck you.
Although I've chosen to use current homophobic terms for "cinaede" and "pathice" in line two, it's important to emphasize that the tenor of the insult is completely different in context. Contemporary society categorizes sexuality in terms of bodies: which kind of biologically sexed body are you attracted to, and is it the same as yours or different? In the ancient world, specifically in the Greek and Roman context, the distinction was about who did what to whom, rather than what kind of body was being done to: the concern was not to be the sexually "passive," i.e. the penetratee, in sexual acts, but rather to be the penetrator, i.e. "active." It was perfectly permissible for adult men to take an active role with whomever, and for boys and youths to take the passive role in such relationships--however, the ideal (or the ideology) was that these relationships would involve at most intercrural sex, rather than anal penetration.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 04:13 (UTC)I love that poem. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 04:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 05:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 05:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 06:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 08:01 (UTC)(I might have liked him better had we translated a different selection of his poems.)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 08:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-22 01:51 (UTC)I should probably try some of his other stuff.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 09:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 09:37 (UTC)ETA: I have a friend with a Catullus icon that says "the sparrow is my penis." It makes me wildly happy.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 19:08 (UTC)Thanks.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-14 23:14 (UTC)You have never seen a room full of young women go so wide-eyed so fast. It floored me that teachers could do this (but, college, so yeah, naive me).
And then I wrote my undergraduate thesis on sexual invective during the reign of the Emperor Domitian.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-15 01:26 (UTC)My own personal Awkward Classics Moment came in my junior year, and involved my lyric professor (unintentionally, I think) dropping into a sex voice to explicate a line reading. We read some of the more explicit Catullus in my intermediate Latin class freshman year, and then in my sophomore year we read Lucretius (and oh man, Lucretius on sex and gender roles during sex is eye-popping), so by the time we did Catullus again it was less shocking.